- Joined
- Jan 14, 2025
- Messages
- 5
- Likes
- 1
That was totally it thank you i was thinking I bought a broken board
Afternoon.I have to comment on your build—that shell looks amazing! I love it! Well done!
I have installed the Blue Retro HW2 internal setup. I want to mention that what I have is thicker than the Methylene. However, I believe he now uses a board instead of a ribbon in his latest update. Therefore, I could be wrong. On the ultra slim shell we have just as if not slightly more room than the SCPH-7900x OEM shell. Gusse would not make it too thick. I wouldn't think fitment is a problem but I (like C3P0 have been wrong from time to time, ha!)
If you place a straight edge across the bottom of the board and see that the ESP-WROOM-32x does not sit higher than the bottom of the controller ports, then you're good. In my build, the ESP was flush with the bottom of the controller port, and it fit just fine. However, I placed the ESP directly onto the motherboard with some thin double-sided tape.
If your shell fits and doesn’t look “pregnant” when it’s all put together, the next question would, of course, be about pinched wires or some insulation is neede on something.
I don’t have all the details about your build, but let me throw this out there—maybe it can help.
My install acted weird too, but it was related to the 3.3V supply. If the 3.3V from the voltage regulator on the Methylene (or ESP in my case) is not tied to the 3.3V on the console, it can behave oddly. This was a huge hang-up for me because it’s generally a big no-no to connect two 3.3V supplies to one power rail. However, in this case, you have to do it to get the features we want (power on/off/reset with the controller). Also, it works, so… I look the other way and just do it.
Now, if the Methylene doesn’t fit, all is not lost. You can save it for another build and just install the ESP-WROOM-32x. Then, pick up a current sense board from Helder's GameTech ($6 plus shipping). You won’t have chimes or the reset function, but you can still power the console on and off with your controller and still have port detection—which is pretty sweet. I can share my diagrams if you want to go that route.
I hope this helps! If you get it working, let us know what you did—I’m curious!
This is my recent build I am refering to.
View attachment 36304
That is brilliant! I knew I must be missing something key to making it work without having to use MC0 or the external USB. Thank you so much for clarifying!The modbo menu is all on the usb. Since the usb is internal (the little piece that gets cut off, then is mounted inside) it all works out well. The elf files can be updated using the remaining external USB port.
I am so glad to help someone out!!That is brilliant! I knew I must be missing something key to making it work without having to use MC0 or the external USB. Thank you so much for clarifying!
I'm shooting for an ultra slim that's as clean as possible and trying to avoid external FMCB/MX4SIO cards so I'm definitely going to go your way and re-enable / relocate the 2nd USB to be internal.
Would you happen to have any pictures of the relocated internal usb?
I would definitely take you up on your offer if you have your internal usb files saved off somewhere you can email. I'm my username @ gmail
Thanks again for the reply!
Evening. I apologize if this has been covered already and I missed it, but for anyone that's integrated an ElectronAnalog; has Electron Shepherd maybe changed their mounting hole offset since this project was created?
Reason for asking is that I'm test fitting mine and noticing that the mounting standoffs on the shell require that the ElectronAnalog be pulled away from a flush fit to be able to utilize them:
View attachment 37289
It leaves a gap that seems to take away from how supported the port would be if it were flush like this:
View attachment 37290
If Electron Shepherd hasn't redesigned the mounting points on the ElectronAnalog, is there another reason for this gap? I.E., Interference with another part, etc? If not, does anyone see any reason why I couldn't mod the model's standoffs to be closer to the HDMI port cutout by a few millimeters?
Thanks!
Evening. I apologize if this has been covered already and I missed it, but for anyone that's integrated an ElectronAnalog; has Electron Shepherd maybe changed their mounting hole offset since this project was created?
Reason for asking is that I'm test fitting mine and noticing that the mounting standoffs on the shell require that the ElectronAnalog be pulled away from a flush fit to be able to utilize them:
It leaves a gap that seems to take away from how supported the port would be if it were flush like this:
If Electron Shepherd hasn't redesigned the mounting points on the ElectronAnalog, is there another reason for this gap? I.E., Interference with another part, etc? If not, does anyone see any reason why I couldn't mod the model's standoffs to be closer to the HDMI port cutout by a few millimeters?
Thanks!